United States Trade Representative Ron Kirk, U.S. Commerce Secretary Gary Locke, Turkish Deputy Prime Minister Ali Babacan, and Turkish Minister of State for Foreign Trade Zafer Çağlayan are pleased to release the following statement, which outlines the overall results of the October 19, 2010, meeting of the U.S. – Turkey Framework for Strategic Economic and Commercial Cooperation.
“We met today in the first formal session of the Framework for Strategic Economic and Commercial Cooperation (“the Framework”). This new process of ministerial level engagement between the governments of Turkey and the United States was inspired by the commitment of our two Presidents in April of 2009 to seek an enhancement of our bilateral economic relations, the goal of which is to intensify economic and commercial cooperation across a wide range of areas through improved bilateral trade and investment and increased cooperation where possible in global markets. Having announced the formation of the process last December, we are pleased that we have been able to come together today to begin our deliberations in earnest.
“The United States and Turkey each have a strong incentive to pursue an intensified bilateral economic relationship. Turkey is a fast-rising economic actor in its region and in the world and many of its firms would like to explore new opportunities in the U.S. market. American companies in turn see vast commercial potential in a rapidly developing Turkey of 73 million people, with onward connections to markets in Europe, the Middle East, Central Asia and beyond.
“We reiterated the importance of the establishment of the Turkey-U.S. Business Council. The Council would bring together American and Turkish business leaders to jointly identify ways to strengthen bilateral economic ties, and develop joint policy recommendations for the U.S. and Turkish governments.
“Our discussion today was the beginning of a new phase in our economic relations, in which we attempt to forge much closer cooperation in several areas, ranging from trade and investment to energy, and from technology and innovation to closer collaboration between our government institutions. We instructed the Framework component mechanisms, the Trade and Investment Council, the Economic Partnership Commission and the Energy Working Group, to explore new and creative ways to spur new economic cooperation over the coming months, and to report back to us by the time of the next Framework meeting. Our political commitment to strengthen our economic relations will establish a firmer footing on which new business partnerships can be established in the future.
“We also held a frank and open dialogue towards creating a common understanding about and overcoming certain difficulties that our companies have encountered as they try to increase their involvement in each other's market. We stand ready to engage with each other wherever possible to identify solutions to these matters and challenges in our bilateral trade.
“Our common goal is to find ways to foster the ability of our companies to succeed in taking greater advantage of the business opportunities that exist in our markets and globally as we deepen and broaden our strategic partnership.
“We envision holding the next meeting of the Framework at ministerial level in Turkey in 2011, at a date to be determined.”
US EXPORT COUNCIL PROVIDES ASSISTANCE TO US COMPANIES SEEKING ACCESS TO HIGH GROWTH MARKETS OVERSEAS. http://usexportcouncil.com/
Sunday, October 24, 2010
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
Tax breaks for jobs on Silicon Valley's agenda
U.S. Commerce Secretary Gary Locke has an agenda when he pays a low-key visit to Silicon Valley on Thursday. So do his hosts.
Locke's stated purpose, according to a department official, is to promote President Obama's National Export Initiative, which intends to double U.S. exports over the next five years while creating millions of U.S. jobs in the bargain.
Tax breaks for corporations that promise to help Obama achieve that goal will be the topic du jour for Silicon Valley CEOs with whom Locke is scheduled to meet behind closed doors.
"We're looking to have a dialogue with the secretary about the economy and jobs, and also making sure corporate tax policy is conducive to American companies being competitive in the global marketplace," said John Noh, a spokesman for San Jose network equipment manufacturer Brocade Communications Systems Inc., which is hosting Locke's visit.
Brocade CEO Mike Klayko invited Locke to visit his company after meetings he and a Silicon Valley Leadership Group delegation had in Washington last week. The delegation's proposal to significantly reduce the 35 percent tax rate on U.S. companies' repatriated foreign earnings, to encourage investment back home, was much discussed with lawmakers and Obama administration officials and, reportedly, quite favorably received.
Obama's kind of company: Klayko was traveling on business and not available for comment, but Carl Guardino, CEO of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, said, "Brocade is exactly the kind of company Obama has in mind."
By that, Guardino meant a midsize tech company that sells 65 percent of its products overseas, while the majority of its 5,000 employees are U.S.-based, mostly in the Silicon Valley, including 900 hired since 2009.
During his visit, Locke will be squired around the company's new, $325 million headquarters in north San Jose, which houses approximately half of Brocade's workforce, and is the centerpiece of a multiuse development that created an estimated 6,000 jobs in the area, Noh said.
No doubt Locke will be told how much better Brocade could do (rumors of an IBM Corp. takeover bid notwithstanding) - if it had more incentive to bring some of its foreign earnings home.
Caveat emptor: President Obama appeared to open the door to the tax-reducing idea on Monday, during a meeting of his economic recovery advisory board, which numbers UC Berkeley's Haas School of Business Professor Laura Tyson among its members.
"We would be very interested in finding ways to lower the corporate tax rate so that companies that are operating overseas can operate effectively and aren't put at a competitive disadvantage," he said.
Obama insisted that any proposal be revenue neutral. We trust he will also insist the tax savings be used for their intended and promised purpose: job creation. As noted, that didn't work out the last time there was a profit repatriation tax "holiday," and many companies stuffed the savings in their pockets.
What U.S. corporations are currently doing with their existing mountains of cash - $1.6 trillion, according to the New York Times - should send up a big red flag. "Few of them are actually spending the money on new factories, equipment or jobs," the Times notes.
Fabulously wealthy multinational Microsoft Corp., for example, just raised $4.75 billion in a bond offering at an "ultralow" interest rate, much of which is going toward share buybacks and the like.
"Borrowing new money on the debt markets is now cheaper than bringing its own money back from overseas," a Microsoft analyst at Moody's told the Times (sfgate.com/ZKJZ).
Moral of story: Take note. Don't get fooled again.
Blogging at sfgate.com/columns/bottomline. Facebook page: sfg.ly/doACKM. Tweeting: @andrewsross. E-mail: bottomline@sfchronicle.com.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/10/06/BU3M1FO7SN.DTL
This article appeared on page E - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle
US EXPORT COUNCIL PROVIDES ASSISTANCE TO US COMPANIES SEEKING ACCESS TO HIGH GROWTH MARKETS OVERSEAS. http://usexportcouncil.com/
Locke's stated purpose, according to a department official, is to promote President Obama's National Export Initiative, which intends to double U.S. exports over the next five years while creating millions of U.S. jobs in the bargain.
Tax breaks for corporations that promise to help Obama achieve that goal will be the topic du jour for Silicon Valley CEOs with whom Locke is scheduled to meet behind closed doors.
"We're looking to have a dialogue with the secretary about the economy and jobs, and also making sure corporate tax policy is conducive to American companies being competitive in the global marketplace," said John Noh, a spokesman for San Jose network equipment manufacturer Brocade Communications Systems Inc., which is hosting Locke's visit.
Brocade CEO Mike Klayko invited Locke to visit his company after meetings he and a Silicon Valley Leadership Group delegation had in Washington last week. The delegation's proposal to significantly reduce the 35 percent tax rate on U.S. companies' repatriated foreign earnings, to encourage investment back home, was much discussed with lawmakers and Obama administration officials and, reportedly, quite favorably received.
Obama's kind of company: Klayko was traveling on business and not available for comment, but Carl Guardino, CEO of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, said, "Brocade is exactly the kind of company Obama has in mind."
By that, Guardino meant a midsize tech company that sells 65 percent of its products overseas, while the majority of its 5,000 employees are U.S.-based, mostly in the Silicon Valley, including 900 hired since 2009.
During his visit, Locke will be squired around the company's new, $325 million headquarters in north San Jose, which houses approximately half of Brocade's workforce, and is the centerpiece of a multiuse development that created an estimated 6,000 jobs in the area, Noh said.
No doubt Locke will be told how much better Brocade could do (rumors of an IBM Corp. takeover bid notwithstanding) - if it had more incentive to bring some of its foreign earnings home.
Caveat emptor: President Obama appeared to open the door to the tax-reducing idea on Monday, during a meeting of his economic recovery advisory board, which numbers UC Berkeley's Haas School of Business Professor Laura Tyson among its members.
"We would be very interested in finding ways to lower the corporate tax rate so that companies that are operating overseas can operate effectively and aren't put at a competitive disadvantage," he said.
Obama insisted that any proposal be revenue neutral. We trust he will also insist the tax savings be used for their intended and promised purpose: job creation. As noted, that didn't work out the last time there was a profit repatriation tax "holiday," and many companies stuffed the savings in their pockets.
What U.S. corporations are currently doing with their existing mountains of cash - $1.6 trillion, according to the New York Times - should send up a big red flag. "Few of them are actually spending the money on new factories, equipment or jobs," the Times notes.
Fabulously wealthy multinational Microsoft Corp., for example, just raised $4.75 billion in a bond offering at an "ultralow" interest rate, much of which is going toward share buybacks and the like.
"Borrowing new money on the debt markets is now cheaper than bringing its own money back from overseas," a Microsoft analyst at Moody's told the Times (sfgate.com/ZKJZ).
Moral of story: Take note. Don't get fooled again.
Blogging at sfgate.com/columns/bottomline. Facebook page: sfg.ly/doACKM. Tweeting: @andrewsross. E-mail: bottomline@sfchronicle.com.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/10/06/BU3M1FO7SN.DTL
This article appeared on page E - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle
US EXPORT COUNCIL PROVIDES ASSISTANCE TO US COMPANIES SEEKING ACCESS TO HIGH GROWTH MARKETS OVERSEAS. http://usexportcouncil.com/
Tax breaks for jobs on Silicon Valley's agenda
U.S. Commerce Secretary Gary Locke has an agenda when he pays a low-key visit to Silicon Valley on Thursday. So do his hosts.
Locke's stated purpose, according to a department official, is to promote President Obama's National Export Initiative, which intends to double U.S. exports over the next five years while creating millions of U.S. jobs in the bargain.
Tax breaks for corporations that promise to help Obama achieve that goal will be the topic du jour for Silicon Valley CEOs with whom Locke is scheduled to meet behind closed doors.
"We're looking to have a dialogue with the secretary about the economy and jobs, and also making sure corporate tax policy is conducive to American companies being competitive in the global marketplace," said John Noh, a spokesman for San Jose network equipment manufacturer Brocade Communications Systems Inc., which is hosting Locke's visit.
Brocade CEO Mike Klayko invited Locke to visit his company after meetings he and a Silicon Valley Leadership Group delegation had in Washington last week. The delegation's proposal to significantly reduce the 35 percent tax rate on U.S. companies' repatriated foreign earnings, to encourage investment back home, was much discussed with lawmakers and Obama administration officials and, reportedly, quite favorably received.
Obama's kind of company: Klayko was traveling on business and not available for comment, but Carl Guardino, CEO of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, said, "Brocade is exactly the kind of company Obama has in mind."
By that, Guardino meant a midsize tech company that sells 65 percent of its products overseas, while the majority of its 5,000 employees are U.S.-based, mostly in the Silicon Valley, including 900 hired since 2009.
During his visit, Locke will be squired around the company's new, $325 million headquarters in north San Jose, which houses approximately half of Brocade's workforce, and is the centerpiece of a multiuse development that created an estimated 6,000 jobs in the area, Noh said.
No doubt Locke will be told how much better Brocade could do (rumors of an IBM Corp. takeover bid notwithstanding) - if it had more incentive to bring some of its foreign earnings home.
Caveat emptor: President Obama appeared to open the door to the tax-reducing idea on Monday, during a meeting of his economic recovery advisory board, which numbers UC Berkeley's Haas School of Business Professor Laura Tyson among its members.
"We would be very interested in finding ways to lower the corporate tax rate so that companies that are operating overseas can operate effectively and aren't put at a competitive disadvantage," he said.
Obama insisted that any proposal be revenue neutral. We trust he will also insist the tax savings be used for their intended and promised purpose: job creation. As noted, that didn't work out the last time there was a profit repatriation tax "holiday," and many companies stuffed the savings in their pockets.
What U.S. corporations are currently doing with their existing mountains of cash - $1.6 trillion, according to the New York Times - should send up a big red flag. "Few of them are actually spending the money on new factories, equipment or jobs," the Times notes.
Fabulously wealthy multinational Microsoft Corp., for example, just raised $4.75 billion in a bond offering at an "ultralow" interest rate, much of which is going toward share buybacks and the like.
"Borrowing new money on the debt markets is now cheaper than bringing its own money back from overseas," a Microsoft analyst at Moody's told the Times (sfgate.com/ZKJZ).
Moral of story: Take note. Don't get fooled again.
Blogging at sfgate.com/columns/bottomline. Facebook page: sfg.ly/doACKM. Tweeting: @andrewsross. E-mail: bottomline@sfchronicle.com.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/10/06/BU3M1FO7SN.DTL
This article appeared on page E - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle
US EXPORT COUNCIL PROVIDES ASSISTANCE TO US COMPANIES SEEKING ACCESS TO HIGH GROWTH MARKETS OVERSEAS. http://usexportcouncil.com/
Locke's stated purpose, according to a department official, is to promote President Obama's National Export Initiative, which intends to double U.S. exports over the next five years while creating millions of U.S. jobs in the bargain.
Tax breaks for corporations that promise to help Obama achieve that goal will be the topic du jour for Silicon Valley CEOs with whom Locke is scheduled to meet behind closed doors.
"We're looking to have a dialogue with the secretary about the economy and jobs, and also making sure corporate tax policy is conducive to American companies being competitive in the global marketplace," said John Noh, a spokesman for San Jose network equipment manufacturer Brocade Communications Systems Inc., which is hosting Locke's visit.
Brocade CEO Mike Klayko invited Locke to visit his company after meetings he and a Silicon Valley Leadership Group delegation had in Washington last week. The delegation's proposal to significantly reduce the 35 percent tax rate on U.S. companies' repatriated foreign earnings, to encourage investment back home, was much discussed with lawmakers and Obama administration officials and, reportedly, quite favorably received.
Obama's kind of company: Klayko was traveling on business and not available for comment, but Carl Guardino, CEO of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, said, "Brocade is exactly the kind of company Obama has in mind."
By that, Guardino meant a midsize tech company that sells 65 percent of its products overseas, while the majority of its 5,000 employees are U.S.-based, mostly in the Silicon Valley, including 900 hired since 2009.
During his visit, Locke will be squired around the company's new, $325 million headquarters in north San Jose, which houses approximately half of Brocade's workforce, and is the centerpiece of a multiuse development that created an estimated 6,000 jobs in the area, Noh said.
No doubt Locke will be told how much better Brocade could do (rumors of an IBM Corp. takeover bid notwithstanding) - if it had more incentive to bring some of its foreign earnings home.
Caveat emptor: President Obama appeared to open the door to the tax-reducing idea on Monday, during a meeting of his economic recovery advisory board, which numbers UC Berkeley's Haas School of Business Professor Laura Tyson among its members.
"We would be very interested in finding ways to lower the corporate tax rate so that companies that are operating overseas can operate effectively and aren't put at a competitive disadvantage," he said.
Obama insisted that any proposal be revenue neutral. We trust he will also insist the tax savings be used for their intended and promised purpose: job creation. As noted, that didn't work out the last time there was a profit repatriation tax "holiday," and many companies stuffed the savings in their pockets.
What U.S. corporations are currently doing with their existing mountains of cash - $1.6 trillion, according to the New York Times - should send up a big red flag. "Few of them are actually spending the money on new factories, equipment or jobs," the Times notes.
Fabulously wealthy multinational Microsoft Corp., for example, just raised $4.75 billion in a bond offering at an "ultralow" interest rate, much of which is going toward share buybacks and the like.
"Borrowing new money on the debt markets is now cheaper than bringing its own money back from overseas," a Microsoft analyst at Moody's told the Times (sfgate.com/ZKJZ).
Moral of story: Take note. Don't get fooled again.
Blogging at sfgate.com/columns/bottomline. Facebook page: sfg.ly/doACKM. Tweeting: @andrewsross. E-mail: bottomline@sfchronicle.com.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/10/06/BU3M1FO7SN.DTL
This article appeared on page E - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle
US EXPORT COUNCIL PROVIDES ASSISTANCE TO US COMPANIES SEEKING ACCESS TO HIGH GROWTH MARKETS OVERSEAS. http://usexportcouncil.com/
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
UN CHIEF EMPHASIZES USE OF BROADBAND INTERNET TO ACCELERATE DEVELOPMENT
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon today stressed the need to harness the power of broadband Internet access to accelerate progress towards the achievement of the development goals intended to alleviate poverty and speed up social and economic advancement in poorer countries.
“Experience has shown that greater access to broadband technologies has meant faster progress towards all the <"http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/">MDGs [Millennium Development Goals],” Mr. Ban said in a <"http://www.un.org/apps/sg/sgstats.asp?nid=4831">message to the Plenipotentiary Conference of the United Nations International Telecommunications Union (<"http://www.itu.int/en/pages/default.aspx">ITU), which got under way today in Guadalajara, Mexico.
“The Internet drives trade, commerce and even education. Telemedicine is improving health care. Earth-monitoring satellites are being used to address climate change issues. And green technologies are promoting cleaner cities.
“Last month the Broadband Commission for Digital Development – a distinguished group of government officials, businesspeople and content developers, brought together under the leadership of ITU and <"http://www.unesco.org/new/en/unesco/">UNESCO [UN Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization] – offered a blueprint, and I look forward to working with all partners in bringing it to life,” the Secretary-General said.
Mr. Ban praised ITU’s central role in the development of the global communications system for 145 years, stressing its invaluable contribution as member of the UN system for the past 60 years.
“From the birth of telegraph to radio, television, satellite communication and the Internet, the ITU has been at the forefront of ‘Connecting the World,’” the Secretary-General said.
He noted that there are currently five billion mobile cellular subscriptions worldwide, and almost two billion people with Internet connection, pointing out that the work of the ITU, its member States, and its “sector members” continues to show how powerful a partnership for development can be when it is based on transparency, openness and cooperation.
“But despite important headway in expanding the benefits of information and communication technology, there is much work ahead. As was emphasized at last month’s Millennium Development Goals Summit in New York, while the digital divide has narrowed, it has far from disappeared,” the Secretary-General said.
“Your work in developing the next generation of communications networks, ensuring cyber-security, and putting the power of ICT [Information and Communication Technologies] networks to good use in disaster relief and mitigation is vitally important to us all,” he added
US EXPORT COUNCIL PROVIDES ASSISTANCE TO US COMPANIES SEEKING ACCESS TO HIGH GROWTH MARKETS OVERSEAS. http://usexportcouncil.com/
“Experience has shown that greater access to broadband technologies has meant faster progress towards all the <"http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/">MDGs [Millennium Development Goals],” Mr. Ban said in a <"http://www.un.org/apps/sg/sgstats.asp?nid=4831">message to the Plenipotentiary Conference of the United Nations International Telecommunications Union (<"http://www.itu.int/en/pages/default.aspx">ITU), which got under way today in Guadalajara, Mexico.
“The Internet drives trade, commerce and even education. Telemedicine is improving health care. Earth-monitoring satellites are being used to address climate change issues. And green technologies are promoting cleaner cities.
“Last month the Broadband Commission for Digital Development – a distinguished group of government officials, businesspeople and content developers, brought together under the leadership of ITU and <"http://www.unesco.org/new/en/unesco/">UNESCO [UN Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization] – offered a blueprint, and I look forward to working with all partners in bringing it to life,” the Secretary-General said.
Mr. Ban praised ITU’s central role in the development of the global communications system for 145 years, stressing its invaluable contribution as member of the UN system for the past 60 years.
“From the birth of telegraph to radio, television, satellite communication and the Internet, the ITU has been at the forefront of ‘Connecting the World,’” the Secretary-General said.
He noted that there are currently five billion mobile cellular subscriptions worldwide, and almost two billion people with Internet connection, pointing out that the work of the ITU, its member States, and its “sector members” continues to show how powerful a partnership for development can be when it is based on transparency, openness and cooperation.
“But despite important headway in expanding the benefits of information and communication technology, there is much work ahead. As was emphasized at last month’s Millennium Development Goals Summit in New York, while the digital divide has narrowed, it has far from disappeared,” the Secretary-General said.
“Your work in developing the next generation of communications networks, ensuring cyber-security, and putting the power of ICT [Information and Communication Technologies] networks to good use in disaster relief and mitigation is vitally important to us all,” he added
US EXPORT COUNCIL PROVIDES ASSISTANCE TO US COMPANIES SEEKING ACCESS TO HIGH GROWTH MARKETS OVERSEAS. http://usexportcouncil.com/
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
South Africa-China Comprehensive Strategic Partnership: dining in the dragon’s lair?
Taku Fundira, a Tralac Researcher, asks and discusses the question: South Africa-China Comprehensive Strategic Partnership: dining in the dragon’s lair?
The Sino-South Africa (RSA) relationship has reached new heights since the establishment in 1998 of diplomatic relations between the two countries. To date, we have witnessed considerable achievements in Sino-RSA economic, trade cooperation and increases in bilateral trade. In 2009, China became South Africa’s largest export destination overtaking the US and trade statistics from the World Trade Atlas reveal that total trade between the two countries reached US$ 15 billion in 2009, accounting for 17% of China-Africa trade. This share places South Africa as China’s second top African trading partner after Angola. The most recent engagement between the two countries is the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (CSP), signed by President Jacob Zuma and his counterpart Premier Hu Jintao on 24 August 2010. This marked the last of a series of state visits by President Zuma to the BRIC nations that began in October of 2009 in Brazil.
38 bilateral cooperation agreements are contained in the declaration, ranging from political dialogues, trade, investment, mineral exploration and agriculture to joint efforts in the global arena, such as in the United Nations and the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC). The signing of the CSP can be viewed as a commitment to further strengthen the bilateral relations between the countries and establish a viable long term relationship which takes into account not only the political, but also the commercial interests of both parties.
For the South African government, this relationship is viewed as a vital strategic foreign policy goal to align itself with the new economic giant. According to Alves and Sidiropoulos (2010), the link between the government’s domestic socio-economic priorities and South Africa’s international relations, is at the forefront. This implies that domestic priorities of enhancing access to quality education, health, job creation and poverty eradication have to be factored in. The complementarities in this case offer South Africa an opportunity to learn from China. For China, South Africa offers among other opportunities a gateway to consolidate and expand its African footprint.
Despite the importance of this south-south configuration from a political and economic view, this relationship is not without its challenges, especially with labour movements which accuse Chinese competition as a key reason for job losses. Furthermore, trade between the two countries mirrors that of South Africa and its traditional north partners, where RSA exports are mainly primary resource based-products and imports are mainly manufactured value added products. The prevalence of non-tariff barriers that exist especially for agriculture further exacerbates the concerns as these are hampering RSA’s penetration of the China market. Despite these concerns and given the current forecasts of China’s future economic size and political weight, the logic of improving relations seems irrefutable.
In tralac’s recent publication on South Africa’s Way Ahead – Looking East, we note that expected losses (employment, wages, and production) in certain sectors will be offset by the opportunities created in other sectors with a competitive potential thus in the long run allowing South Africa to develop and expand trade in its competitive sectors. Affected sectors such as clothing and textiles need to be realigned and adopt new technologies while opportunities exist in the chemicals, plastics and non-ferrous metals sectors.
While South Africa dines in the dragon’s lair, there should be a common understanding amongst South African stakeholders, of China role’s in the global economy. The South African government needs to inform its stakeholders that China’s rise is inevitable, and we should not avoid engaging China effectively on the trade front. Concentrating only on defensive positions, on how to limit China’s impact is counter-productive and will ensure that the Sino-RSA relationship remains skewed in ways that suit the Chinese economy far more than those of South Africa.
http://www.tralac.org/cgi-bin/giga.cgi?cmd=cause_dir_news_item&cause_id=1694&news_id=93462&cat_id=1030
References
Alves and Sidiropoulos (2010), South Africa-China Relations: Getting Beyond the Cross-roads? The Sunday Independent, 29 August 2010, [online] full article
US EXPORT COUNCIL PROVIDES ASSISTANCE TO US COMPANIES SEEKING ACCESS TO HIGH GROWTH MARKETS OVERSEAS. http://usexportcouncil.com/
The Sino-South Africa (RSA) relationship has reached new heights since the establishment in 1998 of diplomatic relations between the two countries. To date, we have witnessed considerable achievements in Sino-RSA economic, trade cooperation and increases in bilateral trade. In 2009, China became South Africa’s largest export destination overtaking the US and trade statistics from the World Trade Atlas reveal that total trade between the two countries reached US$ 15 billion in 2009, accounting for 17% of China-Africa trade. This share places South Africa as China’s second top African trading partner after Angola. The most recent engagement between the two countries is the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (CSP), signed by President Jacob Zuma and his counterpart Premier Hu Jintao on 24 August 2010. This marked the last of a series of state visits by President Zuma to the BRIC nations that began in October of 2009 in Brazil.
38 bilateral cooperation agreements are contained in the declaration, ranging from political dialogues, trade, investment, mineral exploration and agriculture to joint efforts in the global arena, such as in the United Nations and the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC). The signing of the CSP can be viewed as a commitment to further strengthen the bilateral relations between the countries and establish a viable long term relationship which takes into account not only the political, but also the commercial interests of both parties.
For the South African government, this relationship is viewed as a vital strategic foreign policy goal to align itself with the new economic giant. According to Alves and Sidiropoulos (2010), the link between the government’s domestic socio-economic priorities and South Africa’s international relations, is at the forefront. This implies that domestic priorities of enhancing access to quality education, health, job creation and poverty eradication have to be factored in. The complementarities in this case offer South Africa an opportunity to learn from China. For China, South Africa offers among other opportunities a gateway to consolidate and expand its African footprint.
Despite the importance of this south-south configuration from a political and economic view, this relationship is not without its challenges, especially with labour movements which accuse Chinese competition as a key reason for job losses. Furthermore, trade between the two countries mirrors that of South Africa and its traditional north partners, where RSA exports are mainly primary resource based-products and imports are mainly manufactured value added products. The prevalence of non-tariff barriers that exist especially for agriculture further exacerbates the concerns as these are hampering RSA’s penetration of the China market. Despite these concerns and given the current forecasts of China’s future economic size and political weight, the logic of improving relations seems irrefutable.
In tralac’s recent publication on South Africa’s Way Ahead – Looking East, we note that expected losses (employment, wages, and production) in certain sectors will be offset by the opportunities created in other sectors with a competitive potential thus in the long run allowing South Africa to develop and expand trade in its competitive sectors. Affected sectors such as clothing and textiles need to be realigned and adopt new technologies while opportunities exist in the chemicals, plastics and non-ferrous metals sectors.
While South Africa dines in the dragon’s lair, there should be a common understanding amongst South African stakeholders, of China role’s in the global economy. The South African government needs to inform its stakeholders that China’s rise is inevitable, and we should not avoid engaging China effectively on the trade front. Concentrating only on defensive positions, on how to limit China’s impact is counter-productive and will ensure that the Sino-RSA relationship remains skewed in ways that suit the Chinese economy far more than those of South Africa.
http://www.tralac.org/cgi-bin/giga.cgi?cmd=cause_dir_news_item&cause_id=1694&news_id=93462&cat_id=1030
References
Alves and Sidiropoulos (2010), South Africa-China Relations: Getting Beyond the Cross-roads? The Sunday Independent, 29 August 2010, [online] full article
US EXPORT COUNCIL PROVIDES ASSISTANCE TO US COMPANIES SEEKING ACCESS TO HIGH GROWTH MARKETS OVERSEAS. http://usexportcouncil.com/
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Commission for Africa - New Report
Commission for Africa today launched its new report – Still Our Common Interest – which calls upon African leaders to step up efforts to convert unprecedented economic opportunities into poverty reduction and development.
The new report, Still Our Common Interest, follows up on the previous report published in March 2005. It looks at what has happened in Africa in the past five years, conducts an audit of progress against each of the recommendations made in the 2005 report and makes recommendations for next steps.
Still Our Common Interest:
Celebrates the progress Africa has made in the past five years.
Calls on African governments to continue to promote growth and channel revenues into poverty reduction and key services.
Calls for donors to increase their support to Africa to take account of new challenges, in particular climate change.
Calls for the international community to support the capacity-building efforts of African governments by, for example, helping them access the best legal advice in negotiating deals for their natural resources.
Five years after it published its original report, the Commission for Africa is calling on African governments to act now to ensure that the region’s unprecedented economic growth and opportunities result in development and poverty reduction for ordinary Africans.
Africa has seen average growth rates of six per cent for most of the past decade and a quadrupling of trade and foreign investment. Some countries in Africa are on track to meet some of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), reflecting the progress made since the last report. However, the majority of Africans have yet to experience the benefits of economic growth. Progress towards the MDGs needs to be broader and faster if the continent as a whole is to make significant progress towards meeting the MDGs.
In a short joint statement, the Commissioners said:
“There is much to celebrate. African governments have done more than ever before to promote business and investment. Donors have supported this by boosting their support to infrastructure and providing the aid and debt relief that has allowed African governments to increase their expenditure in key areas such as health, education and agriculture.
But there remains much to be done. Progress on reforming international trade rules has been dismal; donors are still providing less in aid than their commitments; and African governments are still not investing as much as they promised in key areas. That is why we believe this review is timely, and why we believe it is right to renew a number of the recommendations we made in 2005 – because they have yet to be fully implemented – as well as make new recommendations.
Africa’s development requires a range of measures, with African governments in the lead supported by the international community. For example, harnessing international demand for Africa’s natural resources to benefit ordinary Africans will depend on the commitment of African governments to passing on the benefits to their citizens, but also them having access to the best legal advice and a system of international trade that does not disadvantage Africa’s products.”
Still Our Common Interest, the Commission’s review of what has happened in and to Africa since it first reported in March 2005, makes recommendations for what needs to happen next to speed up progress on the continent.
It recommends that African governments:
Continue their efforts to make it easier to do business within and between their countries – including investing in much needed infrastructure.
Ensure that they are collecting the revenues from growth through improved domestic resource mobilisation.
Meet their commitments on spending on health, education, water and sanitation, and agriculture.
Develop and deliver clear strategies to create jobs, reduce poverty and strengthen key services such as health and education.
The report also calls upon developed countries to:
Get behind Africa governments’ own strategies for promoting growth and development.
Help Africa negotiate the best deals possible for the exploitation of its natural resources by supporting a fund to pay for the legal and technical advice to do this.
Kick start long-delayed reform of international trade rules.
Continue to support Africa’s development – including by supporting a Global Fund for Education and providing additional financing to adapt to climate change.
Agree that the G20 will take on the G8’s previous role in making and monitoring commitments to supporting growth and development in Africa.
Still Our Common Interest looks at what has happened against the Commission’s various recommendations.
Summary of key findings
In a number of areas, there has been “substantial progress”, including:
Steps taken by African governments to improve the investment climate and increases in aid and debt relief to the continent.
A substantial increase in investment in infrastructure which has contributed to Africa’s growth.
Progress towards an international Arms Trade Treaty.
Strong international support for the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisations (GAVI) that has enabled 300 million children to be immunised globally.
African governments’ commitment alongside strong donor support that has enabled access to the anti-retroviral treatments for HIV/AIDS to grow from 14% in 2005 to 43% in 2008
More children go to primary school and more get to sleep under a bed net that can protect them from malaria than ever before.
Africa is very close to eradicating polio.
But there are also a few areas where progress has been “disappointing”:
International trade reform is perhaps the area of least progress with no movement towards an agreement in the Doha Development Agenda, the removal of agricultural subsidies or trade agreements between the EU and African countries.
The Commission called for the amount of arable land under irrigation in Africa to be increased by 50% by 2010 – it has grown by just 0.9%.
Investment in higher education has not improved – contributing to a continued shortage of trained teachers, doctors and other key professionals.
Progress on most recommendations has been mixed – with some but limited positive movement:
Advances in expanding enrolment and closing the gap between the numbers of girls and boys in primary school is tempered by a relative lack of progress in improving the quality of basic education and in the number finishing primary school and going on to post-primary education.
The spread of HIV/AIDS in Africa has been halted in many parts of the continent, but sub-Saharan Africa remains the worst affected region in the world.
There has been increased donor support to sexual and reproductive health services but overall underinvestment in reproductive health, contributing to the lack of progress in reducing child and maternal mortality.
There still much to be done to attract investment – including a massive need for better infrastructure.
The 2010 report is being launched at the British Museum on 13th September and will also be launched at the MDG Summit in New York on 20th September.
US EXPORT COUNCIL PROVIDES ASSISTANCE TO US COMPANIES SEEKING ACCESS TO HIGH GROWTH MARKETS OVERSEAS. http://usexportcouncil.com/
The new report, Still Our Common Interest, follows up on the previous report published in March 2005. It looks at what has happened in Africa in the past five years, conducts an audit of progress against each of the recommendations made in the 2005 report and makes recommendations for next steps.
Still Our Common Interest:
Celebrates the progress Africa has made in the past five years.
Calls on African governments to continue to promote growth and channel revenues into poverty reduction and key services.
Calls for donors to increase their support to Africa to take account of new challenges, in particular climate change.
Calls for the international community to support the capacity-building efforts of African governments by, for example, helping them access the best legal advice in negotiating deals for their natural resources.
Five years after it published its original report, the Commission for Africa is calling on African governments to act now to ensure that the region’s unprecedented economic growth and opportunities result in development and poverty reduction for ordinary Africans.
Africa has seen average growth rates of six per cent for most of the past decade and a quadrupling of trade and foreign investment. Some countries in Africa are on track to meet some of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), reflecting the progress made since the last report. However, the majority of Africans have yet to experience the benefits of economic growth. Progress towards the MDGs needs to be broader and faster if the continent as a whole is to make significant progress towards meeting the MDGs.
In a short joint statement, the Commissioners said:
“There is much to celebrate. African governments have done more than ever before to promote business and investment. Donors have supported this by boosting their support to infrastructure and providing the aid and debt relief that has allowed African governments to increase their expenditure in key areas such as health, education and agriculture.
But there remains much to be done. Progress on reforming international trade rules has been dismal; donors are still providing less in aid than their commitments; and African governments are still not investing as much as they promised in key areas. That is why we believe this review is timely, and why we believe it is right to renew a number of the recommendations we made in 2005 – because they have yet to be fully implemented – as well as make new recommendations.
Africa’s development requires a range of measures, with African governments in the lead supported by the international community. For example, harnessing international demand for Africa’s natural resources to benefit ordinary Africans will depend on the commitment of African governments to passing on the benefits to their citizens, but also them having access to the best legal advice and a system of international trade that does not disadvantage Africa’s products.”
Still Our Common Interest, the Commission’s review of what has happened in and to Africa since it first reported in March 2005, makes recommendations for what needs to happen next to speed up progress on the continent.
It recommends that African governments:
Continue their efforts to make it easier to do business within and between their countries – including investing in much needed infrastructure.
Ensure that they are collecting the revenues from growth through improved domestic resource mobilisation.
Meet their commitments on spending on health, education, water and sanitation, and agriculture.
Develop and deliver clear strategies to create jobs, reduce poverty and strengthen key services such as health and education.
The report also calls upon developed countries to:
Get behind Africa governments’ own strategies for promoting growth and development.
Help Africa negotiate the best deals possible for the exploitation of its natural resources by supporting a fund to pay for the legal and technical advice to do this.
Kick start long-delayed reform of international trade rules.
Continue to support Africa’s development – including by supporting a Global Fund for Education and providing additional financing to adapt to climate change.
Agree that the G20 will take on the G8’s previous role in making and monitoring commitments to supporting growth and development in Africa.
Still Our Common Interest looks at what has happened against the Commission’s various recommendations.
Summary of key findings
In a number of areas, there has been “substantial progress”, including:
Steps taken by African governments to improve the investment climate and increases in aid and debt relief to the continent.
A substantial increase in investment in infrastructure which has contributed to Africa’s growth.
Progress towards an international Arms Trade Treaty.
Strong international support for the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisations (GAVI) that has enabled 300 million children to be immunised globally.
African governments’ commitment alongside strong donor support that has enabled access to the anti-retroviral treatments for HIV/AIDS to grow from 14% in 2005 to 43% in 2008
More children go to primary school and more get to sleep under a bed net that can protect them from malaria than ever before.
Africa is very close to eradicating polio.
But there are also a few areas where progress has been “disappointing”:
International trade reform is perhaps the area of least progress with no movement towards an agreement in the Doha Development Agenda, the removal of agricultural subsidies or trade agreements between the EU and African countries.
The Commission called for the amount of arable land under irrigation in Africa to be increased by 50% by 2010 – it has grown by just 0.9%.
Investment in higher education has not improved – contributing to a continued shortage of trained teachers, doctors and other key professionals.
Progress on most recommendations has been mixed – with some but limited positive movement:
Advances in expanding enrolment and closing the gap between the numbers of girls and boys in primary school is tempered by a relative lack of progress in improving the quality of basic education and in the number finishing primary school and going on to post-primary education.
The spread of HIV/AIDS in Africa has been halted in many parts of the continent, but sub-Saharan Africa remains the worst affected region in the world.
There has been increased donor support to sexual and reproductive health services but overall underinvestment in reproductive health, contributing to the lack of progress in reducing child and maternal mortality.
There still much to be done to attract investment – including a massive need for better infrastructure.
The 2010 report is being launched at the British Museum on 13th September and will also be launched at the MDG Summit in New York on 20th September.
US EXPORT COUNCIL PROVIDES ASSISTANCE TO US COMPANIES SEEKING ACCESS TO HIGH GROWTH MARKETS OVERSEAS. http://usexportcouncil.com/
Thursday, September 9, 2010
The U.S.overtaken by Sweden and Singapore in the World Economic Forum's competitiveness survey for 2010-11.
The U.S. has slipped to fourth position in global competitiveness this year from the second place it held last year, according to a report by the World Economic Forum (WEF).
Switzerland retains the top position with its excellent capacity for innovation and a very sophisticated business culture, says the Global Competitiveness Report 2010-2011, published on Thursday. Sweden and Singapore have overtaken the US to occupy second and third positions respectively.
The US ranking slipped to second last year with Switzerland making it to the top in global competitiveness.
“While many structural features that make its economy extremely productive, a number of escalating weaknesses have lowered the US ranking over the past two years,” the report said.
“In addition to the macroeconomic imbalances that have been building up over time, there has been a weakening of the United States’ public and private institutions, as well as lingering concerns about the state of its financial markets,” it added.
The report has found deepening weaknesses in certain areas in the US compared with last year.
While quality of institutional environment continues to decline, public's trust in politicians has dwindled.
The business community is concerned about the government’s ability to maintain arms-length relationships with the private sector. It feels that the government is spending its resources relatively wastefully, the report said.
Further, the report points to rising concerns over the functioning of private institutions with a noticeable decline in assessment of auditing and reporting standards including corporate ethics.
Macroeconomic instability in the US is the greatest area of weakness, said the report.
“Prior to the crisis, the United States had been building up large macroeconomic imbalances, with repeated fiscal deficits leading to burgeoning levels of public indebtedness; this has been exacerbated by significant stimulus spending,” the report points out.
In this scenario, the country needs a clear exit strategy to strengthen its competitiveness in future, the report states.
In Eurozone countries, Germany moves up to fifth place from seventh in 2009 while the UK has climbed one position to 12th after witnessing a continuous fall in ranking in recent years.
Among the BRIC economies, China continues to improve its competitiveness with its ranking moving up from 29th to 27th while Brazil (58th), India (51st) and Russia (63rd) have retained their positions.
“While emerging economies have, for the most part, bounced back to healthy growth, advanced economies face continuing difficulties such as persisting unemployment, weak demand, and spiraling debt, while still struggling with reforms in the financial and labor markets, among other challenges,” the report said.
The report measures the competitiveness of 139 countries taking into account various performance parameters like macroeconomic environment, health and primary education, goods and labour market efficiency, financial market development, technological readiness, business sophistication, innovation etc.
US EXPORT COUNCIL PROVIDES ASSISTANCE TO US COMPANIES SEEKING ACCESS TO HIGH GROWTH MARKETS OVERSEAS. http://usexportcouncil.com/
Switzerland retains the top position with its excellent capacity for innovation and a very sophisticated business culture, says the Global Competitiveness Report 2010-2011, published on Thursday. Sweden and Singapore have overtaken the US to occupy second and third positions respectively.
The US ranking slipped to second last year with Switzerland making it to the top in global competitiveness.
“While many structural features that make its economy extremely productive, a number of escalating weaknesses have lowered the US ranking over the past two years,” the report said.
“In addition to the macroeconomic imbalances that have been building up over time, there has been a weakening of the United States’ public and private institutions, as well as lingering concerns about the state of its financial markets,” it added.
The report has found deepening weaknesses in certain areas in the US compared with last year.
While quality of institutional environment continues to decline, public's trust in politicians has dwindled.
The business community is concerned about the government’s ability to maintain arms-length relationships with the private sector. It feels that the government is spending its resources relatively wastefully, the report said.
Further, the report points to rising concerns over the functioning of private institutions with a noticeable decline in assessment of auditing and reporting standards including corporate ethics.
Macroeconomic instability in the US is the greatest area of weakness, said the report.
“Prior to the crisis, the United States had been building up large macroeconomic imbalances, with repeated fiscal deficits leading to burgeoning levels of public indebtedness; this has been exacerbated by significant stimulus spending,” the report points out.
In this scenario, the country needs a clear exit strategy to strengthen its competitiveness in future, the report states.
In Eurozone countries, Germany moves up to fifth place from seventh in 2009 while the UK has climbed one position to 12th after witnessing a continuous fall in ranking in recent years.
Among the BRIC economies, China continues to improve its competitiveness with its ranking moving up from 29th to 27th while Brazil (58th), India (51st) and Russia (63rd) have retained their positions.
“While emerging economies have, for the most part, bounced back to healthy growth, advanced economies face continuing difficulties such as persisting unemployment, weak demand, and spiraling debt, while still struggling with reforms in the financial and labor markets, among other challenges,” the report said.
The report measures the competitiveness of 139 countries taking into account various performance parameters like macroeconomic environment, health and primary education, goods and labour market efficiency, financial market development, technological readiness, business sophistication, innovation etc.
US EXPORT COUNCIL PROVIDES ASSISTANCE TO US COMPANIES SEEKING ACCESS TO HIGH GROWTH MARKETS OVERSEAS. http://usexportcouncil.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
